Timing Is Everything

Citigroup Tower, NYC
If there is an aphorism that relates to fancy company headquarters, it's well-known:
"When an organization has a truly comfortable headquarters which meets all its needs, its decline has begun."*
*Thanks to
Everyone is unique, but we are all infinitely more alike than we are different.
My site is meant to introduce you to my novels,
my opinions, and some investment advice. Soon I may write about genetic genealogy.
Enjoy!

Citigroup Tower, NYC
If there is an aphorism that relates to fancy company headquarters, it's well-known:
"When an organization has a truly comfortable headquarters which meets all its needs, its decline has begun."*
*Thanks to
It might surprise those unfamiliar with blogging to know that most bloggers' immediate family members don't often, if ever, read their blogs. It follows, then, that bloggers don't get much encouragement. They also get paid less than mathematicians, like most hard scientists, another group whose writings tend to be unread by their own families. The point is, it's a wonder of the world that there are any bloggers at all.
On the other hand, it is fun to get your own views out there, and sometimes, you know that extremely intelligent and educated readers in places far, far away have read your entries for a long time. Maybe they are quietly reposing alone with candlelight and a sleeping pet. Perhaps they just want to rest for a few minutes on a sunny, breezy mountaintop with a view and an internet connection. Somehow that makes it all worthwhile.
Thanks to CNBC, here is a wonderful chart of a summary of the testimony of hedge fund managers today:
Highlights From Hedge Fund Hearing
George Soros:— Crisis Was Generated By Financial System Itself
— Financial System Pricing Somewhat Distorted In Proportion To Actual Problem— Regulators Must Accept Responsibility For Controlling Asset Bubbles
— Controlling Credit Means Using Regulations That Have Fallen Into Disuse
— Financial Market Reforms Must Be International In Scope— Basel Accords Need To Be Replaced By New Rules Reflecting New Paradigm
— Hedge Funds Need To Be Regulated Within New Framework
— Underregulation Helped Cause Current Problem, But Overregulation A Danger As Well
— Hedge Funds Helped Cause Bubble, But Have Been Devastated By Its Bursting
James Simons:
— Rating Agencies Are Among The Most Culpable For Current Problems
— Hedge Funds Were Not A Major Cause of Current Systemic Risk
— Additional Regulation Focused On Market Integrity Would Be Appropriate
— Most Important Step We Can Take Is To Keep People In Their Homes
— More Transparency From Hedge Funds Could Be Helpful
— Any Change In Tax Policy Should Be Applied Equally To All
— PIMCO, Others Should Sponsor A New Derivatives Rating Agency
Philip Falcone:
— Hedge Funds Have Positive Role In Financial Markets
— Compensation In Hedge Fund Business Is Performance Based
— Short Selling Is A Valuable Long Standing Feature of our Markets
— Our Analysts Perform Thorough Due Diligence, Not Relying On Rating Agencies
Kenneth Griffin:
— Champions The Idea of Building Clearinghouse For Credit Default Swaps
— Proper Regulation Is Key To Health Of Financial Markets
— Congress, Regulators, Industry Must All Work Together
— We Must Not Stifle Best Innovative Qualities Of Our Financial Markets
Major news outlets are saying that they were "called to testify" before a House committee.
James Simon politely thanked the House for the opportunity to offer comments. He made my favorite quote:
There is much blame to be shared: the SEC and perhaps the Federal Reserve for taking such a hands-off position on the leverage posture of the investment banks and the uncontrolled nature of the CDS market; the players all along the chain of creation and distribution of the paper, each of whom should have blown a whistle rather than passing the problem on to the next guy; and finally, and in my opinion the most culpable, the rating agencies, which failed in their duty and allowed sows' ears to be sold as silk purses.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/27699730
Here is an excerpt of an article from Kiplinger’s Magazine listing ten large-cap companies that should do well over the next ten years:
1) Procter & Gamble (PG): Daily grooming products, 10% earnings, div + yield
2) Electronic Arts (ERTS): World’s biggest video-game software company. Sales and earnings over 21%.
3) First Solar (FSLR): American government subsidized. Alternative energy will be especially popular if oil prices rise. 56% earnings; efficient production process.
4) Gilead Sciences (GILD): HIV and other portfolio of drugs, robust growth.
5) Google (GOOG): 22% earnings. Internet giant with advertising revenues.
6) Monsanto (MON): 41% earnings. Technology lead and worldwide sales.
7) Norfolk & Southern (NSR): More efficient than rival railroad CSX.
8) T Rowe Price (TROW): low costs, profits of 15-39% annually.
9) Schlumberger (SLB): world’s largest energy services &exploration company, 12 % earnings.
10) Visa (V): world’s largest payment processor, recent IPO, more business expected.
We can check this list in a decade and see which ones did as well as propounded (if we remember).
By the way, not a single one of these stocks has achieved more than O% gains in a one-year chart. Going back years they look far more compelling.
Most important, they are all considered by Kiplinger’s to be very well-capitalized to survive a challenging marketplace. Oct. 31, 2008
Average Pretax Profit Margin: 14%
Average Pretax Profit Margin: 14%
Average Pretax Profit Margin: 13%
Average Pretax Profit Margin: 13%
Average Pretax Profit Margin: 11%
Average Pretax Profit Margin: 10%
Average Pretax Profit Margin: 10%
Average Pretax Profit Margin: 9%
Average Pretax Profit Margin: 9%
Average Pretax Profit Margin: 8%
My apologies for the uneven type which I cannot seem to correct.
The only one that surprised me is #7, where shoe repair shops are cited as the next big “home-based business”!
Further information is at the article here:
http://www.forbes.com/2008/10/14/profitable-home-businesses-ent-fin-cx_mf_1014mostprofitablehomebiz.html?feed=rss_newsMost Generous Corporations - Cash Donations:
No. 1: Wal-Mart Stores
2007 cash donation: $301 million
2007 cash donation: $211 million
2007 cash donation: $173 million
2007 cash donation: $146 million
2007 cash donation: $127 million
2007 cash donation: $122 million
2007 cash donation: $119 million
2007 cash donation: $114 million
2007 cash donation: $110 million
2007 cash donation: $103 million
Most Generous Corporations - Percentage of Income:
1.6% of operating income
2007 cash donation: $8 million
2006 operating income: $492 million
1.4% of operating income
2007 cash donation: $59 million
2006 operating income: $4.1 billion
1.4% of operating income
2007 cash donation: $31 million
2006 operating income: $2.2 billion
1.3% of operating income
2007 cash donation: $70 million
2006 operating income: $5.4 billion
1.3% of operating income
2007 cash donations: $301 million
2006 operating income: $23.6 billion
1.2% of operating income
2007 cash donation: $10 million
2006 operating income: $531 million
1% of operating income
2007 cash donations: $25 million
2006 operating income: $2.5 billion
0.9% of operating income
2007 cash donation: $74 million
2006 operating income: $7.8 billion
0.9% of operating income
2007 cash donation: $30 million
2006 operating income: $3.2 billion
The New York Times currently has fine reporting with one of its reporters, Paul Krugman, today capturing the Nobel Prize for Economics.
Paul Krugman's article "Gordon Does Good" in The Times today illuminates the banking issues at the heart of the American financial crisis and posits that the U.K. has taken on a leadership role:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/13/opinion/13krugman.html?hp
Here are my favorite excerpts:
What is the nature of the crisis? The details can be insanely complex, but the basics are fairly simple. The bursting of the housing bubble has led to large losses for anyone who bought assets backed by mortgage payments; these losses have left many financial institutions with too much debt and too little capital to provide the credit the economy needs; troubled financial institutions have tried to meet their debts and increase their capital by selling assets, but this has driven asset prices down, reducing their capital even further.
...to deal with the problem of inadequate financial capital by having governments provide financial institutions with more capital in return for a share of ownership.
This sort of temporary part-nationalization, which is often referred to as an “equity injection,” is the crisis solution advocated by many economists — and sources told The Times that it was also the solution privately favored by Ben Bernanke, the Federal Reserve chairman.
But when Henry Paulson, the U.S. Treasury secretary, announced his plan for a $700 billion financial bailout, he rejected this obvious path, saying, “That’s what you do when you have failure.” Instead, he called for government purchases of toxic mortgage-backed securities, based on the theory that ... actually, it never was clear what his theory was.
...Meanwhile, the British government went straight to the heart of the problem — and moved to address it with stunning speed. On Wednesday, Mr. Brown’s officials announced a plan for major equity injections into British banks, backed up by guarantees on bank debt that should get lending among banks, a crucial part of the financial mechanism, running again. And the first major commitment of funds will come on Monday — five days after the plan’s announcement.
At a special European summit meeting on Sunday, the major economies of continental Europe in effect declared themselves ready to follow Britain’s lead, injecting hundreds of billions of dollars into banks while guaranteeing their debts.
...Mr. Paulson — after arguably wasting several precious weeks — has also reversed course, and now plans to buy equity stakes rather than bad mortgage securities.
...All across the executive branch, knowledgeable professionals have been driven out; there may not have been anyone left at Treasury with the stature and background to tell Mr. Paulson that he wasn’t making sense.
Luckily for the world economy, however, Gordon Brown and his officials are making sense. And they may have shown us the way through this crisis.
It's an excellent article from Paul Krugman, now an even more influential journalist, after this morning's announcement of his Nobel Prize, and I am sure it reflects very well on The New York Times and other journalists there as well.
It also reflects well on Princeton University where he is professor of Economics and International Affairs, and more celebrated than ever.
Interesting that the Nobel Committee must have had its eye on him for at least five years "for his work on global trade patterns".
Lawmakers and government finance heads must actually and in real time "do the right thing" with lasting consequences, very serious achievements in my view. Let's hope they too get their just rewards.
There aren't enough Nobel Prizes to go around. It is, as always, a gift.
Most hedge funds open up a crack on Sept. 30, Dec. 31, March 31 and June 30 to give investors the chance to “redeem” their investments, meaning take their money out. These moments are called gates, like a series of gates in a prison. The gate is the limit, the fixed percentage of your money, that the fund will allow you to take out at one time. Even with these strict caps on withdrawals, some funds may end up nothing but shells.
Shed no tears for the Masters of the Universe, however, not that your correspondent actually thought you might. Most of the young Masters already have their own personal nut free and clear. “Nut” is the term for the amount of money you need salted away in weather-proof investments in order to generate enough interest to live comfortably in Greenwich on Round Hill Road, Pecksland Road or Field Point Road in a house built before the First World War in an enchanting European style, preferably made of stone featuring the odd turret, with a minimum of five acres around it and big enough to be called a manor. Every Master of the Universe knows the number.